<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How &#8220;Windows Phone 7 Series&#8221; Makes Sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.navarr.me/2010/02/how-windows-phone-7-series-makes-sense.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.navarr.me/2010/02/how-windows-phone-7-series-makes-sense.html</link>
	<description>The Technical Side of my Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navarr Barnier</title>
		<link>http://tech.navarr.me/2010/02/how-windows-phone-7-series-makes-sense.html/comment-page-1#comment-4272</link>
		<dc:creator>Navarr Barnier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.gtaero.net/2010/02/how-windows-phone-7-series-makes-sense.html#comment-4272</guid>
		<description>I too think it looked a bit sluggish.  Personally, I think they just haven&#039;t finished polishing up the way the user-interface responds (at least I pray thats the case, because if it IS this is the best phone I&#039;ve ever seen in my life).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is a long name, but not too long.  I mean, the previous phones were what &quot;Windows Mobile 6.5&quot; now its &quot;Windows Phone 7.&quot;  Its not that big of a change, and not one that matters all that much anyway, its just an operating system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too think it looked a bit sluggish.  Personally, I think they just haven&#39;t finished polishing up the way the user-interface responds (at least I pray thats the case, because if it IS this is the best phone I&#39;ve ever seen in my life).</p>
<p>It is a long name, but not too long.  I mean, the previous phones were what &#8220;Windows Mobile 6.5&#8243; now its &#8220;Windows Phone 7.&#8221;  Its not that big of a change, and not one that matters all that much anyway, its just an operating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pikachu</title>
		<link>http://tech.navarr.me/2010/02/how-windows-phone-7-series-makes-sense.html/comment-page-1#comment-4263</link>
		<dc:creator>Pikachu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.gtaero.net/2010/02/how-windows-phone-7-series-makes-sense.html#comment-4263</guid>
		<description>I still think that Windows Phone 7 is still an incredibly long name for an mobile OS. I would have chosen something like WinMobi7, or something along those lines.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, is it just me, or does Windows Phone 7 seem a bit sluggish in the engadget videos? (no, it&#039;s not my RAM acting up.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think that Windows Phone 7 is still an incredibly long name for an mobile OS. I would have chosen something like WinMobi7, or something along those lines.</p>
<p>But, is it just me, or does Windows Phone 7 seem a bit sluggish in the engadget videos? (no, it&#39;s not my RAM acting up.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

